Linux-Kernel Archive
By Thread

Starting: Sat Mar 08 2003 - 07:51:35 EST
Ending: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 21:57:59 EST

• Re: 2.5.64p5 No USB support when APIC mode enabled Meino Christian Cramer (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 07:29:39 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64p5 No USB support when APIC mode enabled Nicolas Mailhot (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:48:10 EST)
• Updated 2.4 htree patches available for 2.4.21rc5 Theodore Ts'o (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:13:57 EST)
  • Still getting some NFS htree strangeness Jeremy Fitzhardinge (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:14:05 EST)
• Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:24:49 EST)
  • Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:47:24 EST)
    • Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) Randy.Dunlap (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:16:35 EST)
      • 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:22:25 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Alan Cox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 12:01:00 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:29:46 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Alan Cox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:09:28 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Zach Brown (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:02:49 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:39:30 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:07:26 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Richard Henderson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 02:52:23 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 03:02:08 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Richard Henderson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 03:17:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 03:45:35 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 04:17:40 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:28:21 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:38:19 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Bill Davidsen (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:14:01 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Arjan van de Ven (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:19:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:20:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Arjan van de Ven (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:24:57 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:35:10 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Arjan van de Ven (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:43:11 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:47:08 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Randy.Dunlap (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:38:09 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Randy.Dunlap (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:50:32 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:25:01 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 13:33:38 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:54:05 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:18:32 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:28:25 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:07:10 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 03:04:11 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Helge Hafting (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 05:00:24 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:02:24 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:07:13 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Linus Torvalds (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:24:04 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Jonathan Lundell (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 20:08:26 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Randy.Dunlap (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 23:29:06 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Jonathan Lundell (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 01:26:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:24:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Randy.Dunlap (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 14:47:35 EST)
      • [PATCH] OOPS counters Randy.Dunlap (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:32:27 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 16:13:28 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:03:20 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:04:29 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Denis Vlasenko (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 02:14:59 EST)
      • Backward disassembling (was: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp) Szakacsits Szabolcs (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 07:16:12 EST)
      • Re: Backward disassembling (was: Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp) Jonathan Lundell (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 11:53:11 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:34:10 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Olaf Titz (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:01:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.63 accesses below %esp (was: Re: ntfs OOPS (2.5.63)) Richard B. Johnson (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 13:56:10 EST)
• what's an OOPS Ludootje (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:47:10 EST)
  • Re: what's an OOPS bert hubert (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:05:58 EST)
  • Re: what's an OOPS John Bradford (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:20:17 EST)
    • Re: what's an OOPS Szakacsits Szabolcs (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:01:34 EST)
      • Re: what's an OOPS John Bradford (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:54:46 EST)
      • Re: what's an OOPS Ludootje (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:37:48 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:11:42 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:09:37 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:53:46 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Chris Wedgwood (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:02:12 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Oliver Xymoron (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:46:17 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:29:08 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:43:31 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:26:37 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:55:06 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Joel Becker (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:41:30 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:52:39 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Joel Becker (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:16:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:21:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Joel Becker (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:31:56 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:37:14 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:36:53 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:56:35 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Gerrit Huizenga (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 00:08:06 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:31:37 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Joel Becker (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:39:33 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:59:44 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:37:22 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:50:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:00:16 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:23:28 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:26:15 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:31:46 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:59:14 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:09:22 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:32:56 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 00:11:37 EST)
• Re: 2.5.64-mm2 Shawn (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 08:59:02 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64-mm2 Shawn (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:45:34 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64-mm2 Robert Love (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:49:53 EST)
• Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [BK updates] Geert Uytterhoeven (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:40:45 EST)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [BK updates] James Simmons (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:11:13 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] small fix for aty128fb support on ia64 Jesse Barnes (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 16:48:27 EST)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [BK updates] Antonino Daplas (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:02:57 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] gen_init_cpio fixes for 2.5.64 Anders Gustafsson (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:37:45 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] gen_init_cpio fixes for 2.5.64 Greg KH (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:04:52 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] gen_init_cpio fixes for 2.5.64 Anders Gustafsson (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:28:15 EST)
    • [PATCH] fix big initramfs (was: [PATCH] gen_init_cpio fixes for 2.5.64) Anders Gustafsson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 03:22:03 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fix big initramfs (was: [PATCH] gen_init_cpio fixes for 2.5.64) Andrew Morton (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 03:48:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fix big initramfs (was: [PATCH] gen_init_cpio fixes for 2.5.64) Anders Gustafsson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 04:25:37 EST)
• [PATCH] oops in raw.c + fix Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:50:39 EST)
• Re: CONFIG_ALPHA_SRM not compiling on 2.5 Ivan Kokshaysky (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:53:01 EST)
  • Re: CONFIG_ALPHA_SRM not compiling on 2.5 Christian (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:36:40 EST)
• Allocating memory Prasad (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 09:54:25 EST)
• Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:10:07 EST)
  • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Albert Cahalan (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:30:29 EST)
    • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:41:12 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Segher Boessenkool (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:00:58 EST)
  • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Segher Boessenkool (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:50:43 EST)
    • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Albert Cahalan (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:31:14 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:43:00 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Segher Boessenkool (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:14:52 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Andrew Fleming (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:54:12 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Albert Cahalan (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:13:20 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Andrew Fleming (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:25:15 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc mikpe@csd.uu.se (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:30:58 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Albert Cahalan (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:10:53 EST)
      • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc mikpe@csd.uu.se (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:42:25 EST)
    • Re: [patch] oprofile for ppc Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:38:11 EST)
• Re: [BK FBDEV] Updates. James Simmons (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:12:45 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] 6/6 cacheline align files_lock Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:41:42 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 6/6 cacheline align files_lock Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:54:56 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] 6/6 cacheline align files_lock Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:10:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 6/6 cacheline align files_lock Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:10:11 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] 6/6 cacheline align files_lock Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:20:54 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 6/6 cacheline align files_lock William Lee Irwin III (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:38:24 EST)
• [Bug 452] New: Null pointer dereference in find_inode_fast Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:44:21 EST)
• Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:50:48 EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 10:54:02 EST)
    • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 David S. Miller (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:03:17 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:35:24 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 David S. Miller (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:22:24 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Larry McVoy (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:07:41 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:22:35 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:02:32 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:56:38 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Roman Zippel (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:24:51 EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:13:09 EST)
    • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:28:43 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:08:18 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:25:13 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Larry McVoy (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:30:07 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Daniel Egger (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:32:26 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:46:20 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Daniel Egger (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:19:10 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:49:37 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Daniel Egger (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:40:40 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:01:56 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Hans-Peter Jansen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 15:33:25 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Daniel Egger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:02:57 EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Roman Zippel (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:55:15 EST)
    • RE: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Vlad@geekizoid.com (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:06:14 EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:52:58 EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:10:28 EST)
    • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:29:46 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:46:12 EST)
      • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:37:46 EST)
  • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 12:27:07 EST)
    • Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 H. Peter Anvin (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:22:44 EST)
• Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:07:11 EST)
  • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:19:36 EST)
    • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:48:16 EST)
      • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:05:32 EST)
      • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Eric W. Biederman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:01:05 EST)
  • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:21:13 EST)
    • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Willy Tarreau (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:57:43 EST)
  • Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:46:33 EST)
• Console weirdness Jan Dittmer (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:29:51 EST)
  • Re: Console weirdness Jan Dittmer (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:53:53 EST)
  • Re: Console weirdness Andrew Morton (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:17:21 EST)
    • Re: Console weirdness Jan Dittmer (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:59:31 EST)
      • Re: Console weirdness Siim Vahtre (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:29:05 EST)
      • Re: Console weirdness Paweł Gołaszewski (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:29:26 EST)
• 2.4.x IDE: Statis=0x58 - Drive not ready for command Anders Widman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:54:47 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.x IDE: Statis=0x58 - Drive not ready for command Anders Widman (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:35:08 EST)
• hm, page 000f0000 reserved twice ? Stephan von Krawczynski (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 12:18:17 EST)
  • Re: hm, page 000f0000 reserved twice ? Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:46:22 EST)
    • Re: hm, page 000f0000 reserved twice ? Stephan von Krawczynski (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:18:08 EST)
• [BUG 380][PATCHv2] SB16 compile errors Lukas@Razik.de (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:08:30 EST)
  • Re: [BUG 380][PATCHv2] SB16 compile errors Christoph Hellwig (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:12:00 EST)
  • Re: [BUG 380][PATCHv2] SB16 compile errors shaheed (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 05:39:25 EST)
• Re: [patch] updated scheduler-tunables for 2.5.64-mm2 Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:25:16 EST)
  • Re: [patch] updated scheduler-tunables for 2.5.64-mm2 Robert Love (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:54:29 EST)
    • Re: [patch] updated scheduler-tunables for 2.5.64-mm2 Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:18:51 EST)
      • Re: [patch] updated scheduler-tunables for 2.5.64-mm2 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:28:17 EST)
• Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Aaron Lehmann (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:28:21 EST)
• OLS2003 Performance BOF Proposals Ruth Forester (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:51:03 EST)
  • Re: OLS2003 Performance BOF Proposals Craig Thomas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:12:48 EST)
  • OLS2003 Performance BOF Proposals Sandra K Johnson (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:14:15 EST)
• 2.4.21-pre5-ac2: kernel oops with "swapoff -a" walt (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 06:07:37 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre5-ac2: kernel oops with "swapoff -a" Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:40:06 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.21-pre5-ac2: kernel oops with "swapoff -a" John Bradford (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:42:41 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre5-ac2: kernel oops with "swapoff -a" walt (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 11:52:02 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.21-pre5-ac2: kernel oops with "swapoff -a" walt (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 13:51:27 EST)
• Plans for Posix sem_init() for pshared = 1 ? Marc D Bumble (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:20:24 EST)
  • Re: Plans for Posix sem_init() for pshared = 1 ? Ulrich Drepper (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:57:18 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Add COMPATIBLE_IOCTL for AutoFS4 and SPARC64 Marcel Holtmann (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:45:43 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Add COMPATIBLE_IOCTL for AutoFS4 and SPARC64 David S. Miller (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:29:30 EST)
• Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports Adam J. Richter (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:48:20 EST)
  • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports Bryan Whitehead (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:25:53 EST)
    • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports David Woodhouse (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 10:23:50 EST)
  • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports Adam J. Richter (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:37:20 EST)
  • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports Theodore Ts'o (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:07:03 EST)
  • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports whitnl73@juno.com (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:12:14 EST)
  • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports Adam J. Richter (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 14:06:23 EST)
  • Re: devfs + PCI serial card = no extra serial ports Adam J. Richter (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 19:02:38 EST)
• Re: PATCH for ide-tape driver Alan Stern (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:01:57 EST)
• PCI driver module unload race? Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 05:47:49 EST)
  • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:12:37 EST)
    • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Petr Vandrovec (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:47:14 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:51:18 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Petr Vandrovec (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:33:43 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:03:52 EST)
    • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:09:43 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Greg KH (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:21:02 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Greg KH (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:44:43 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Oliver Neukum (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:48:43 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Greg KH (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:51:31 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Roman Zippel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:04:20 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Greg KH (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:15:32 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Oliver Neukum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:00:40 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Patrick Mochel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:06:54 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Oliver Neukum (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:07:09 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Roman Zippel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 06:05:17 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Patrick Mochel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:27:27 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Roman Zippel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:09:17 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Patrick Mochel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:15:31 EST)
      • Re: PCI driver module unload race? Roman Zippel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:28:38 EST)
• [PATCH] Register tty_devclass before use Russell King (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 07:11:03 EST)
• Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members David S. Miller (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:50:24 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members chas williams (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:35:41 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members David S. Miller (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:34:53 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members chas williams (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:50:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members David S. Miller (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:11:08 EST)
• IBM^H^H^HHitachi disk tools (was Re: Disabling ATAPI retry?) Barry K. Nathan (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:18:59 EST)
• Re: [PATCH][ATM] cleanup nicstar, suni and idt77105 David S. Miller (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:01:12 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH][ATM] cleanup nicstar, suni and idt77105 chas williams (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:39:46 EST)
• Promise TX2-Ultra100 PDC20268 lockups Panagiotis Papadakos (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:49:12 EST)
  • Re: Promise TX2-Ultra100 PDC20268 lockups Anders Widman (Thu Mar 07 2002 - 18:15:52 EST)
• Re: OLS2003 Performance BOF Proposals Nivedita Singhvi (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:15:34 EST)
• kmsgdump && ksymoops result for the 1GB RAM problem in enterprise kernel Adrian Golumbovici (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 14:28:40 EST)
• kernel didn't compile deivis bluznevičius (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:21:54 EST)
• 2.5.64: kernel BUG at include/linux/dcache.h Jean-Denis Girard (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:06:19 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64: kernel BUG at include/linux/dcache.h Kevin P. Fleming (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 19:19:25 EST)
• very buggy 3DFx framebuffer support!!! :( Michal Semler (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:23:18 EST)
  • Re: very buggy 3DFx framebuffer support!!! :( Jurriaan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 00:54:53 EST)
    • Re: very buggy 3DFx framebuffer support!!! :( Paolo Ornati (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:22:47 EST)
    • Re: very buggy 3DFx framebuffer support!!! :( Michal Semler (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:19:56 EST)
• Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Bill Davidsen (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:28:10 EST)
  • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Andries Brouwer (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:23:51 EST)
    • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Alan Cox (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:30:38 EST)
      • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Andre Hedrick (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:17:54 EST)
    • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Bill Davidsen (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:38:07 EST)
  • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:17:15 EST)
    • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Bill Davidsen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:30:08 EST)
  • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:41:21 EST)
    • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Bill Davidsen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:24:25 EST)
  • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:41:24 EST)
  • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Thomas.Mieslinger@gls-germany.com (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:03:22 EST)
  • Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 04:46:48 EST)
• Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Daniel Phillips (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:54:20 EST)
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Andrew Morton (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:19:56 EST)
  • Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Stephen C. Tweedie (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:04:15 EST)
• Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 17:52:52 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Larry McVoy (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 19:05:14 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Davide Libenzi (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:21:13 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:45:22 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Roman Zippel (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:19:05 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Linus Torvalds (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:42:24 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Roman Zippel (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:32:26 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Eric W. Biederman (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:34:30 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Roman Zippel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:35:11 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:55:44 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:20:45 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:48:00 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Larry McVoy (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:58:52 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:32:46 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:54:02 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Larry McVoy (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:28:35 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 15:00:18 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Linus Torvalds (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:39:28 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:58:14 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Larry McVoy (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:20:09 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone fs (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:19:32 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:41:45 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:21:39 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Roman Zippel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:01:19 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:13:32 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Olivier Galibert (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:49:55 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:05:46 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:03:18 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:40:43 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 13:46:37 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:30:26 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:33:41 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Andrew Morton (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:08:24 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 15:29:10 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Werner Almesberger (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:14:08 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:48:17 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Werner Almesberger (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:11:09 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 07:29:03 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 15:53:55 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:26:05 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Petr Baudis (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:32:46 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Petr Baudis (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 18:39:10 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 19:39:24 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:47:50 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Larry McVoy (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:03:09 EST)
      • [PATCH] ~/kernel/sys.c (2.5.64) (trivial) Jay Patrick Howard (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:49:09 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 00:22:25 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 00:44:37 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:48:03 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:03:14 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 11:53:01 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:02:36 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:25:40 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Werner Almesberger (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:19:31 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:31:49 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 10:32:38 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 11:13:39 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 08:22:22 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:52:15 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 12:00:48 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Zack Brown (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:48:07 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 17:04:02 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 11:21:42 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:25:54 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Robert Anderson (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:53:34 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Randy.Dunlap (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 16:50:01 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Robert Anderson (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 17:16:06 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Robert Anderson (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 17:18:56 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Petr Baudis (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 19:18:40 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Davide Libenzi (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 19:53:59 EST)
      • Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Stig Brautaset (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 19:55:13 EST)
      • Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Tom Lord (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 20:44:58 EST)
      • Re: [arch-users] Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Adam Spiers (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 21:06:17 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 06:34:31 EST)
      • Thoughts about ideal kernel SCM Petr Baudis (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:02:33 EST)
      • Re: Thoughts about ideal kernel SCM Larry McVoy (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:32:33 EST)
      • Re: Thoughts about ideal kernel SCM Petr Baudis (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:29:52 EST)
      • Re: Thoughts about ideal kernel SCM Pavel Machek (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 05:36:15 EST)
      • Re: Thoughts about ideal kernel SCM Petr Baudis (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 17:56:24 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:41:20 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Jamie Lokier (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:52:48 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:38:09 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:06:36 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Kaz Kylheku (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:00:29 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:37:50 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone H. Peter Anvin (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:54:01 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Daniel Phillips (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 21:00:54 EST)
      • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Fri Mar 14 2003 - 20:03:42 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:23:11 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:15:42 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:17:23 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Larry McVoy (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:48:49 EST)
    • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone David Woodhouse (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 13:51:38 EST)
  • Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Kai Henningsen (Sat Mar 15 2003 - 05:47:00 EST)
• [PATCH] remove compile warning from serial console initcall Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:06:55 EST)
• [NFS] Race in rpc_delete_timer causes crash Ulrich Weigand (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:03:45 EST)
  • Re: [NFS] Race in rpc_delete_timer causes crash Ion Badulescu (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:12:13 EST)
• Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Daniel Phillips (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:10:12 EST)
  • Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Alex Tomas (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:08:34 EST)
    • Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Daniel Phillips (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:58:16 EST)
    • Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Theodore Ts'o (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:25:15 EST)
  • Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Alex Tomas (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:26:01 EST)
  • Re: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3 Bill Davidsen (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 16:57:22 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.21pre5-ac2 Horst von Brand (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:37:30 EST)
• kmsgdump && ksymoops result for the 1GB RAM problem in kernel compiled with high-mem (4GB) Adrian Golumbovici (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 15:07:03 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.5.64 multicast: find interface correctly Ted Phelps (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 18:49:51 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.5.64 multicast: find interface correctly David S. Miller (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 19:02:44 EST)
• 2.5.64-mjb2 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Martin J. Bligh (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:21:26 EST)
  • 2.5.64-mjb3 (scalability / NUMA patchset) Martin J. Bligh (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 00:15:56 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] scsi_error fix Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:41:56 EST)
• Question about VISWS 2.5.64-ac3 Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:58:03 EST)
• New IDE codes in 2.5.64-ac3 Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:16:15 EST)
  • Re: New IDE codes in 2.5.64-ac3 Alan Cox (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:53:13 EST)
• 2.5.64-bk3 UML kernel available William Stearns (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:19:12 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.62-AC1 (16/21) SCSI Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:31:06 EST)
• scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 rwhron@earthlink.net (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:50:15 EST)
  • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Zwane Mwaikambo (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:07:04 EST)
  • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:59:50 EST)
    • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:13:47 EST)
  • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:42:04 EST)
  • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:46:36 EST)
    • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:54:33 EST)
  • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 rwhron@earthlink.net (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:09:23 EST)
    • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:37:57 EST)
  • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 rwhron@earthlink.net (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 21:46:29 EST)
    • Re: scheduler starvation running irman with 2.5.64bk2 Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 22:43:39 EST)
• Re: High Mem Options Bill Davidsen (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 21:41:20 EST)
• [PATCH] Documentation/00-INDEX update Thomas Molina (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:06:59 EST)
• [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:52:45 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (2/20) char dev update Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:13:43 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (1/20) boot98 update Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:12:08 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (3/20) console Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:14:55 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (4/20) misc core Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:16:10 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (5/20) core update Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:17:22 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (6/20) DMA Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:18:31 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (8/20) input update Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:20:57 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (7/20) IDE Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:19:38 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (9/20) kanji Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:22:31 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (10/20) kconfig Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:23:57 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (12/20) parport Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:26:50 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (11/20) NIC Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:25:19 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (11/20) NIC Paul Gortmaker (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:15:13 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (11/20) NIC Osamu Tomita (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:07:48 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (14/20) PCMCIA Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:28:48 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (13/20) PCI Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:27:49 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (15/20) RTC Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:31:30 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (16/20) SCSI Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:34:03 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (16/20) SCSI Geert Uytterhoeven (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:49:14 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (17/20) serial Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:35:27 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (18/20) setup resources Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:36:41 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (19/20) SMP Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:40:53 EST)
  • [PATCH] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.64-ac3 (20/20) timer Osamu Tomita (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:42:59 EST)
• [PATCH] kconfig update Roman Zippel (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 22:57:54 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Christoph Hellwig (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:59:15 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Petr Baudis (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:14:14 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Roman Zippel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:46:18 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Sam Ravnborg (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:01:03 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Roman Zippel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:30:02 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Sam Ravnborg (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:34:39 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Roman Zippel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:18:30 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Sam Ravnborg (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:15:18 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Roman Zippel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:00:02 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Sam Ravnborg (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:12:45 EST)
• Some oddity with hdparm and linux-2.5.64bk3 Martin Schlemmer (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:31:53 EST)
• Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree Martin Schlemmer (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 23:33:45 EST)
  • Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree Andreas Dilger (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:32:19 EST)
    • Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree Martin Schlemmer (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:36:33 EST)
  • Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree Theodore Ts'o (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 01:19:11 EST)
    • Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree Martin Schlemmer (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 03:27:08 EST)
    • Re: Corruption problem with ext3 and htree Martin Schlemmer (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 14:17:22 EST)
• RE: Help please: DVD ROM read difficulty Guangyu Kang (Shanghai) (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 00:48:19 EST)
• Re: [patch 1/5] missing spin_unlock() in sysfs_remove_dir() Jeremy Fitzhardinge (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:32:49 EST)
• 2.5.64-mm4 Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:36:47 EST)
• 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Jason Straight (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:44:11 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 01:55:22 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Jason Straight (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:16:44 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Duncan Sands (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:02:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Jason Straight (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:04:51 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Adam J. Richter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:34:01 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:39:13 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Jason Straight (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:52:13 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Thomas Molina (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:09:01 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk3 no screen after Ok booting kernel Adam J. Richter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:51:52 EST)
• Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Kevin Brosius (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:30:45 EST)
  • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:08:39 EST)
    • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:17:06 EST)
      • [PATCH] Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Todd Mokros (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:28:30 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:42:09 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Linus Torvalds (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:49:29 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:21:09 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:29:44 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:46:50 EST)
  • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Felipe Alfaro Solana (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:05:39 EST)
    • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Linus Torvalds (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:33:37 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 05:20:02 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:44:48 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Linus Torvalds (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:02:31 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:09:13 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Linus Torvalds (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:18:06 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:34:37 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:46:11 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Linus Torvalds (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:46:22 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Jamie Lokier (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:55:38 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Denis Vlasenko (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:04:24 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 18:35:56 EST)
      • Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Matti Aarnio (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:48:36 EST)
      • [PATCH] Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 22:45:35 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? Andrew Morton (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 23:57:49 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Re: Runaway cron task on 2.5.63/4 bk? george anzinger (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:09:42 EST)
• 2.5.64-mm4: kernel BUG at include/linux/dcache.h:266! (sysfs_get_dentry) Jeremy Fitzhardinge (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:32:40 EST)
• 2.5.64 file permissions William Stearns (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:36:16 EST)
• 2.5.64-bk3: aironet driver problem Joseph Pingenot (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 03:49:49 EST)
• Re: Available watchdog test cases Paul Rolland (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:40:58 EST)
  • Re: Available watchdog test cases Rusty Lynch (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:23:08 EST)
    • Re: Available watchdog test cases Paul Rolland (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:02:16 EST)
      • Re: Available watchdog test cases Randy.Dunlap (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 23:35:43 EST)
• unable to boot praveen R-R.No.200201004 (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:47:13 EST)
  • Re: unable to boot John Bradford (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 04:54:38 EST)
  • Re: unable to boot Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:02:40 EST)
• [Bug 2.5.64 ???] Immediate reboot at boot Paul Rolland (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 05:09:26 EST)
  • Re: [Bug 2.5.64 ???] Immediate reboot at boot Paul Rolland (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:38:22 EST)
    • Re: [Bug 2.5.64 ???] Immediate reboot at boot Paul Rolland (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:59:14 EST)
• PROBLEM Kósa Ferenc (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:49:55 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM John Bradford (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:55:02 EST)
• deadlock in 2.5.64 ppp? Andreas Jellinghaus (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 06:13:52 EST)
• 2.5.64-mm4 tiobench (as vs dl) Nick Piggin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 07:28:46 EST)
• Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Dave Jones (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:54:03 EST)
  • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries Brouwer (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:13:14 EST)
    • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Dave Jones (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:33:59 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Christoph Hellwig (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:55:55 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries Brouwer (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:31:44 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Roman Zippel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:18:24 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries Brouwer (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:08:24 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Alexander Viro (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:23:41 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Roman Zippel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:58:17 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries Brouwer (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:05:34 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Roman Zippel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:25:49 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries Brouwer (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:32:19 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Roman Zippel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:39:17 EST)
  • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. J.A. Magallon (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:45:52 EST)
    • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Dave Jones (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:11:29 EST)
      • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. J.A. Magallon (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:59:34 EST)
      • Re: struct inode size reduction. Miles Bader (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:04:57 EST)
  • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:30:23 EST)
  • Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:32:57 EST)
• RE: [PATCH] Avoid PC(?) specific cascade dma reservation inkernel /dma.c Mikael Starvik (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 08:49:14 EST)
  • RE: [PATCH] Avoid PC(?) specific cascade dma reservation inkernel /dma.c Alan Cox (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:32:56 EST)
  • RE: [PATCH] Avoid PC(?) specific cascade dma reservation inkernel /dma.c Mikael Starvik (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:25:55 EST)
• [PATCH, resend] fs/proc/base.c: Expose file descriptors' f_pos Kenn Humborg (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:02:17 EST)
• [PATCH] add missing module license to ipfwadm_core.c Geoffrey Lee (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:18:17 EST)
• Compilation error 1394 with 2.4.21-pre5 Kyuma Ohta (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:34:06 EST)
  • Re: Compilation error 1394 with 2.4.21-pre5 Marc-Christian Petersen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:51:03 EST)
• 2.4: high system load with SG_IO on IDE-SCSI: PIO? Matthias Andree (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:49:09 EST)
  • Re: 2.4: high system load with SG_IO on IDE-SCSI: PIO? Douglas Gilbert (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:35:50 EST)
    • Re: 2.4: high system load with SG_IO on IDE-SCSI: PIO? Matthias Andree (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:31:39 EST)
• [OOPS] oops with linux-2.5.64 + cset-1.1068.1.17-to-1.1166.gz Craig Schlenter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 09:51:06 EST)
• 2.5.64 - sysfs/pcmcia oops? CaT (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:09:21 EST)
• [PATCH] fix oprofile on x86 > 1 counter John Levon (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:48:42 EST)
• Re: 2.5.64-mm1 Alexander Hoogerhuis (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:54:47 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64-mm1 Alexander Hoogerhuis (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 02:50:19 EST)
  • [opps] 2.5.64-mm1 Ed Tomlinson (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 17:46:52 EST)
• [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:32:42 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:45:06 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:34:47 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem Andries Brouwer (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:57:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:25:53 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Work around console initialization ordering problem Johannes Erdfelt (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:42:01 EST)
• [PATCH] Fix memory leak in copy_thread Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:33:39 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in copy_thread - correction. Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:20:36 EST)
• [PATCH] Fast path context switch - microoptimize FPU reload Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:39:45 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Fast path context switch - microoptimize FPU reload Manfred Spraul (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:15:09 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Fast path context switch - microoptimize FPU reload Andi Kleen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:30:39 EST)
• [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Marc Zyngier (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 11:43:38 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Justin T. Gibbs (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:08:30 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Marc Zyngier (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:20:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Justin T. Gibbs (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:15:47 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Marc Zyngier (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 02:53:56 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Justin T. Gibbs (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:39:39 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EISA aic7770 broken Marc Zyngier (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:43:48 EST)
• Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Tomasz Torcz, BG (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 14:20:50 EST)
  • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Martin J. Bligh (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:45:30 EST)
    • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Patrick Mochel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:07:08 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Patrick Mochel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:31:12 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Jeremy Fitzhardinge (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:34:38 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Patrick Mochel (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:06:24 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Jeremy Fitzhardinge (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:14:34 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Craig Schlenter (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:28:04 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir CaT (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:40:15 EST)
      • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Patrick Mochel (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:45:07 EST)
  • Re: Kernel bug in dcache.h:266; 2.5.64, EIP at sysfs_remove_dir Craig Schlenter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:28:57 EST)
• Re: 2.5.63-mm2 rwhron@earthlink.net (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:35:51 EST)
• [2.4] ufs memleak Oleg Drokin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 12:34:33 EST)
• Oops in 2.5.64bk3 J Sloan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:09:34 EST)
  • 2.5.64-mm4 looking good (Re: Oops in 2.5.64bk3) J Sloan (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:54:57 EST)
• tbench 192 "failed to start 192 clients" on 2.5.64 rwhron@earthlink.net (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:18:33 EST)
• [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Ben Collins (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:14:13 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Greg KH (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:11:02 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Ben Collins (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:02:32 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Patrick Mochel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:59:42 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Ben Collins (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:55:48 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Greg KH (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:21:55 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Ben Collins (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:12:51 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Patrick Mochel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:45:12 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device removal callback Ben Collins (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:30:07 EST)
• Memleak in iso9660 fs (rockridge extension) on read error Oleg Drokin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 13:27:26 EST)
• Re: 2.5.63: ACPI S3 and S4 suspend problems Pavel Machek (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 17:26:10 EST)
• Re: Reserving physical memory at boot time Pavel Machek (Fri Mar 07 2003 - 18:19:54 EST)
  • Re: Reserving physical memory at boot time H. Peter Anvin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:08:39 EST)
    • Re: Reserving physical memory at boot time Randy.Dunlap (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:07:30 EST)
• Re: sys32_ioctl -> compat_ioctl -- generic Pavel Machek (Thu Mar 06 2003 - 18:37:21 EST)
  • Re: sys32_ioctl -> compat_ioctl -- generic Stephen Rothwell (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:44:18 EST)
  • Re: sys32_ioctl -> compat_ioctl -- generic Andi Kleen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:28:10 EST)
• 2.5.64-bk[2-4]: CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API breaks kernel/cpufreq.c compile Adam J. Richter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:17:29 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64-bk[2-4]: CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API breaks kernel/cpufreq.c compile Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:35:59 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (1/7): fix cpufreq core breakage(s) Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:22 EST)
  • Re: Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (1/7): fix cpufreq core breakage(s) Pavel Machek (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:06:39 EST)
    • Re: Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (1/7): fix cpufreq core breakage(s) Dave Jones (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:29:17 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (5/7): add support for ICH4-M chipset in speedstep driver Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:39 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (2/7): fix userspace governor Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:27 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (4/7): updated cpufreq ref-counting and locking scheme Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:36 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (3/7): remove unneeded code Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:31 EST)
• Trivial: read-protected files in kernel tar distribution Adam J. Richter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:41:31 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (7/7): update documentation Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:56 EST)
• Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:39:48 EST)
  • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Pavel Machek (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:12:50 EST)
  • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Patrick Mochel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:49:01 EST)
    • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Pavel Machek (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:23:00 EST)
      • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Patrick Mochel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:05:10 EST)
      • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Nigel Cunningham (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:17:06 EST)
      • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Pavel Machek (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 18:20:57 EST)
  • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Patrick Mochel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 11:51:21 EST)
    • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Pavel Machek (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:12:17 EST)
      • Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Patrick Mochel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:59:26 EST)
• Fwd: [PATCH] cpufreq (6/7): allow cpufreq drivers to export sysfs files Russell King (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 14:36:44 EST)
• Module XXX can not be unloaded davidsen (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:19:02 EST)
  • Re: Module XXX can not be unloaded GertJan Spoelman (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:49:03 EST)
• [2.5.64-mm4] ext-fs errors @ mounting loop device Siim Vahtre (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:30:25 EST)
• NCPFS memleak/crazyness? Oleg Drokin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:30:48 EST)
  • [PATCH] Re: NCPFS memleak/crazyness? Petr Vandrovec (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:43:27 EST)
• Memleak in Windows Logical Disk Manager partition handler Oleg Drokin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 15:41:25 EST)
• patching the kernel joe briggs (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:11:21 EST)
  • Re: patching the kernel Sam Ravnborg (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:19:59 EST)
  • Re: patching the kernel Jan-Benedict Glaw (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:25:22 EST)
  • Re: patching the kernel scott thomason (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 23:41:03 EST)
• Memleak in ircomm_core Oleg Drokin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:14:34 EST)
  • Re: Memleak in ircomm_core Neale Banks (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:48:29 EST)
• [PATCH] Syntax errors in 2.4.21pre5 configure scripts Andreas Gruenbacher (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:19:37 EST)
• memleak in 802.1q vlan proc code Oleg Drokin (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:21:52 EST)
  • Re: memleak in 802.1q vlan proc code David S. Miller (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:41:45 EST)
• Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: FBdev updates. Petr Vandrovec (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:29:03 EST)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: FBdev updates. Antonino Daplas (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:27:14 EST)
    • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: FBdev updates. Petr Vandrovec (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:54:56 EST)
      • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: FBdev updates. Antonino Daplas (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:44:31 EST)
  • Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: FBdev updates. James Simmons (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 10:31:55 EST)
• oops Thomas Kaeding (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 16:52:17 EST)
• Oops in ext3 error handling -> journal_abort Zwane Mwaikambo (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:07:16 EST)
  • Re: Oops in ext3 error handling -> journal_abort Andrew Morton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:29:42 EST)
• Re: [patch] work around gcc-3.x inlining bugs Kurt Garloff (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:40:57 EST)
• [BUG][2.5.64bk4] Weird problem with 2 PCs Shawn Starr (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 17:49:40 EST)
  • Re: [BUG][2.5.64bk4] Weird problem with 2 PCs Lionel Bouton (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:06:53 EST)
  • Re: [BUG][2.5.64bk4] Weird problem with 2 PCs Shawn Starr (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:58:20 EST)
• 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Adam J. Richter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:05:12 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Adam J. Richter (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:08:26 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Martin J. Bligh (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:27:31 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Adam J. Richter (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:46:05 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure William Lee Irwin III (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 03:57:54 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Martin J. Bligh (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 10:14:33 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Adam J. Richter (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 12:08:13 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Adam J. Richter (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:22:16 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Martin J. Bligh (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:18:00 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64bk5: X86_PC + HIGHMEM boot failure Adam J. Richter (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 14:39:11 EST)
• [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Zwane Mwaikambo (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 18:44:47 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Robert Love (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:00:01 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Zwane Mwaikambo (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:03:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Robert Love (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:10:24 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Zwane Mwaikambo (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 20:11:13 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Robert Love (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:15:25 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Linus Torvalds (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:33:47 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Roman Zippel (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 16:54:53 EST)
      • [PATCH] (0/8) replace brlock with RCU Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:13:52 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (0/8) replace brlock with RCU Linus Torvalds (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:23:24 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (0/8) replace brlock with RCU David S. Miller (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:28:31 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (0/8) replace brlock with RCU Roman Zippel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:36:34 EST)
      • [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:14:36 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Roman Zippel (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:03:14 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Zwane Mwaikambo (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:13:09 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Paul McKenney (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 15:28:12 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Zwane Mwaikambo (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:54:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Paul McKenney (Thu Mar 13 2003 - 16:54:49 EST)
      • [PATCH] (2/8) Eliminate brlock for packet_type Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:14:40 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (2/8) Eliminate brlock for packet_type David S. Miller (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:20:53 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (2/8) Eliminate brlock for packet_type Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:25:48 EST)
      • [PATCH] (3/8) Eliminate brlock from vlan Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:14:45 EST)
      • [PATCH] (4/8) Eliminate brlock in net/bridge Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:14:51 EST)
      • [PATCH] (5/8) Eliminate brlock from netfilter Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:14:54 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (5/8) Eliminate brlock from netfilter Zwane Mwaikambo (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 20:25:40 EST)
      • [PATCH] (6/8) Eliminate brlock from ipv4 Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:15:13 EST)
      • [PATCH] (7/8) Eliminate brlock from IPV6 Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:15:21 EST)
      • [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:15:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock David S. Miller (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:23:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:31:46 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock David S. Miller (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:34:08 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Linus Torvalds (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:44:46 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Stephen Hemminger (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 19:48:18 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Alan Cox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 21:31:03 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Andi Kleen (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 00:56:09 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock David S. Miller (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 01:35:49 EST)
• [PATCH] kobject support for LSM core Petr Baudis (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:13:10 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] kobject support for LSM core Greg KH (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 01:47:38 EST)
    • [PATCH] kobject support for LSM core (v2) Petr Baudis (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 18:20:27 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kobject support for LSM core (v2) Greg KH (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:12:53 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] kobject support for LSM core (v2) Chris Wright (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 19:37:55 EST)
• Oops: kernel 2.4.20, ide-scsi, cdrecord 1.11a24 Jonathan Woithe (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 19:25:46 EST)
  • Re: Oops: kernel 2.4.20, ide-scsi, cdrecord 1.11a24 Jonathan Woithe (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 19:40:21 EST)
    • Re: Oops: kernel 2.4.20, ide-scsi, cdrecord 1.11a24 Alan Cox (Tue Mar 11 2003 - 11:53:17 EST)
• 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:29:10 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 04:12:32 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:05:25 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest William Lee Irwin III (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:21:00 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:29:53 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:27:19 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 04:21:17 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:25:44 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 05:37:38 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 06:19:49 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 07:30:56 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 20:22:12 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 22:39:11 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Wed Mar 12 2003 - 23:31:45 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:31:27 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:31:18 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:43:26 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:42:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 05:54:23 EST)
  • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Ed Tomlinson (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:43:00 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Con Kolivas (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 07:47:34 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:41:09 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Ed Tomlinson (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 08:41:01 EST)
      • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:12:56 EST)
    • Re: 2.5.64-mm2->4 hangs on contest Mike Galbraith (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:04:15 EST)
• [RFT] port of Lockmeter on i386 2.5.64 Patch Hanna Linder (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 21:48:30 EST)
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFT] port of Lockmeter on i386 2.5.64 Patch William Lee Irwin III (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:00:59 EST)
  • Re: [RFT] port of Lockmeter on i386 2.5.64 Patch Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:33:49 EST)
    • Re: [RFT] port of Lockmeter on i386 2.5.64 Patch Robert Love (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 00:36:56 EST)
• Re: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Linus Torvalds (Sun Mar 09 2003 - 22:07:36 EST)
  • Re: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Andi Kleen (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 06:06:35 EST)
    • Re: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Linus Torvalds (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 13:33:41 EST)
  • Re: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Linus Torvalds (Mon Mar 10 2003 - 17:44:23 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] nonlinear oddities Ed Tomlinson (Sat Mar 08 2003 - 20:37:47 EST)