Linux-Kernel Archive
By Thread

Starting: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 00:04:18 EST
Ending: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 20:51:51 EST

• Freeze with 2.4.10 and xcdroast Steven Walter (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 00:01:36 EST)
• Throttling DVD spin rate on powerbook Jeffrey W. Baker (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 00:03:15 EST)
• Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Bernd Eckenfels (Sun Oct 07 2001 - 23:58:27 EST)
  • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 08:58:22 EST)
    • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Robert Olsson (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:42:08 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:39:31 EST)
  • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 09:45:02 EST)
    • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Scott Laird (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:36:21 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 22:17:00 EST)
    • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Werner Almesberger (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:04:13 EST)
  • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:00:36 EST)
    • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Jeff Garzik (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:03:57 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:12:53 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:09:57 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:22:16 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:20:32 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:35:24 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:57:11 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:11:03 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 jamal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:11:12 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Pavel Machek (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 11:26:52 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Pavel Machek (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 11:25:11 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:24:50 EST)
      • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:35:50 EST)
    • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:19:52 EST)
  • Re: [announce] [patch] limiting IRQ load, irq-rewrite-2.4.11-B5 bill davidsen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:10:04 EST)
• Re: [BUG] emu10k1 and SMP Robert Love (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 00:13:33 EST)
  • Re: [BUG] emu10k1 and SMP Kenneth Johansson (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:49:42 EST)
    • Re: [BUG] emu10k1 and SMP Rui Sousa (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 05:47:04 EST)
      • Re: [BUG] emu10k1 and SMP Kenneth Johansson (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:10:04 EST)
• Re: zisofs doesn't compile in 2.4.10-ac7 Keith Owens (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 00:53:20 EST)
  • Re: zisofs doesn't compile in 2.4.10-ac7 Keith Owens (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 01:22:59 EST)
  • Re: zisofs doesn't compile in 2.4.10-ac7 David Woodhouse (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:32:48 EST)
    • Re: zisofs doesn't compile in 2.4.10-ac7 H. Peter Anvin (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:59:25 EST)
• [PATCH] buglet in arch/i386/setup.c (2.4.10-ac7) Andrey Panin (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 01:06:49 EST)
• Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 -- __builtin_expect James Antill (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 01:17:33 EST)
• [PATCH] Toshiba driver compilation error brett (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 02:28:53 EST)
• Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 1.4 is available. Keith Owens (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 02:08:43 EST)
• Re: PCI problem with 2.4.10 on 82434LX chipset david (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 02:23:42 EST)
  • Re: PCI problem with 2.4.10 on 82434LX chipset david (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:13:46 EST)
• Have problems with big kernel? Here is a loadlin replacement VDA (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 03:49:23 EST)
  • Re: Have problems with big kernel? Here is a loadlin replacement VDA (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:54:18 EST)
  • Re: Have problems with big kernel? Here is a loadlin replacement VDA (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:31:36 EST)
• Re: Problem with reiserfs 3.5.34 under 2.2.19 Nikita Danilov (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 03:04:13 EST)
• [PATCH] spurious swap_list_unlock Hugh Dickins (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 03:42:14 EST)
• Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem Padraig Brady (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 03:39:14 EST)
  • Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem Padraig Brady (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 03:58:52 EST)
  • Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem Trond Myklebust (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 05:04:04 EST)
  • Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem Jamie Lokier (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 10:24:19 EST)
  • Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem Andi Kleen (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 11:12:51 EST)
    • Re: Finegrained a/c/mtime was Re: Directory notification problem Jamie Lokier (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 14:38:20 EST)
• [BUG] Missing wake_up in drivers/scsi/sg.c Taral (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 04:03:48 EST)
• Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets Pantelis Antoniou (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 04:35:27 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 04:49:46 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets Pantelis Antoniou (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:25:19 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets David S. Miller (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 04:24:05 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets Keith Owens (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 06:27:19 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets george anzinger (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:29:56 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets Georg Nikodym (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:56:11 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets george anzinger (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:00:38 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets Pantelis Antoniou (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:38:52 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] Standard way of generating assembler offsets David S. Miller (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 04:28:34 EST)
• reiser and smp problems resolved? Narancs v1 (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 04:47:20 EST)
• Re: Tyan Tiger MP AMD760 chipset support Steffen Persvold (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 05:09:49 EST)
  • Re: Tyan Tiger MP AMD760 chipset support Steven Newbury (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:05:01 EST)
  • Re: Tyan Tiger MP AMD760 chipset support Dan Hollis (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:40:06 EST)
• 2.4.11.p4 and dd Klaus Dittrich (Sun Oct 07 2001 - 13:35:40 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.11.p4 and dd Tobias Ringstrom (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 06:45:09 EST)
    • Re: 2.4.11.p4 and dd Constantin Loizides (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:03:12 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.11.p4 and dd Mike Fedyk (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:55:28 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.11.p4 and dd Stephan von Krawczynski (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:04:22 EST)
• Re: Quotactl change Nathan Scott (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 05:34:18 EST)
  • Re: Quotactl change Alexander Viro (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:03:49 EST)
  • Re: Quotactl change Jan Kara (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:34:25 EST)
    • Re: Quotactl change Nathan Scott (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:21:43 EST)
• Re: Question concerning SBLIVE! driver. Rui Sousa (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 05:49:16 EST)
  • Re: Question concerning SBLIVE! driver. Nick Lockyer (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:42:42 EST)
    • Re: Question concerning SBLIVE! driver. John Gluck (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:12:17 EST)
• Re: compaq 1202, pcmcia trouble Erik Mouw (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 06:24:06 EST)
• 2.4.10-ac7 vmware-2.0.4-1142 breakage Hans-Peter Jansen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:02:05 EST)
• Re: low-latency patches Helge Hafting (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:47:30 EST)
  • Re: low-latency patches george anzinger (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:41:18 EST)
    • Re: low-latency patches Andrew Morton (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:24:33 EST)
      • Re: low-latency patches Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:36:09 EST)
  • Re: low-latency patches David Balazic (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:27:09 EST)
• Re: Linux should not set the "PnP OS" boot flag Thomas Hood (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:40:21 EST)
  • Re: Linux should not set the "PnP OS" boot flag Stelian Pop (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 08:25:44 EST)
    • Re: Linux should not set the "PnP OS" boot flag J.D. Hood (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:12:09 EST)
• RE: How can I jump to non-linux address space? Richard B. Johnson (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:51:25 EST)
  • RE: How can I jump to non-linux address space? Ian Thompson (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:43:45 EST)
    • Re: How can I jump to non-linux address space? Russell King (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:01:53 EST)
• kernel oops Terry Kendal (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:59:33 EST)
• PCI driver works, why not supporting the EISA bus too? Shaul Karl (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 08:16:46 EST)
• EMC SYMMETRIX multiple LUN's Andre Margis (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 08:50:08 EST)
  • RE: EMC SYMMETRIX multiple LUN's conway, heather (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:16:20 EST)
  • RE: EMC SYMMETRIX multiple LUN's conway, heather (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:20:50 EST)
• implementation of SIOCGIFFCOUNT Sebastian Heidl (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 08:52:37 EST)
  • Re: implementation of SIOCGIFFCOUNT BALBIR SINGH (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 09:03:40 EST)
• [RFC] I still see people using cli() BALBIR SINGH (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 09:29:05 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Victor Yodaiken (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 09:49:50 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Eric W. Biederman (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:11:57 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Victor Yodaiken (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:42:41 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Eric W. Biederman (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:45:19 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Victor Yodaiken (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:12:46 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Eric W. Biederman (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:09:33 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() Victor Yodaiken (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:42:11 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] I still see people using cli() george anzinger (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:11:12 EST)
• Problem creating filesystems (and othe operations) under 2.4.10 quintaq@yahoo.co.uk (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 09:50:17 EST)
  • Re: Problem creating filesystems (and othe operations) under 2.4.10 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:16:47 EST)
• Re: %u-order allocation failed Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:01:05 EST)
  • Re: %u-order allocation failed Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:08:43 EST)
  • Re: %u-order allocation failed Mikulas Patocka (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:21:04 EST)
    • Re: %u-order allocation failed David Lang (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:16:04 EST)
    • Re: %u-order allocation failed Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:53:18 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Mikulas Patocka (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:31:59 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:44:00 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Mikulas Patocka (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:46:52 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Pavel Machek (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 04:45:48 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Linus Torvalds (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:48:30 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Mikulas Patocka (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:54:49 EST)
      • Re: %u-order allocation failed Rik van Riel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:48:04 EST)
  • Re: %u-order allocation failed Pavel Machek (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:44:37 EST)
• Re: Context switch times bill davidsen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:19:49 EST)
  • Re: Context switch times Mika Liljeberg (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:07:26 EST)
    • discontig physical memory Petko Manolov (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:54:30 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:05:28 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory Petko Manolov (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:18:25 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:29:35 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory Petko Manolov (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:34:33 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory Petko Manolov (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:36:11 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 20:37:18 EST)
      • Re: discontig physical memory Petko Manolov (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:43:12 EST)
  • Re: Context switch times Richard Gooch (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:55:23 EST)
    • Re: Context switch times David S. Miller (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:00:28 EST)
    • Re: Context switch times bill davidsen (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:49:24 EST)
  • Re: Context switch times Hubertus Franke (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:37:24 EST)
    • Re: Context switch times george anzinger (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:50:16 EST)
      • Re: Context switch times Hubertus Franke (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 05:52:56 EST)
  • Re: Context switch times Mike Fedyk (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:07:43 EST)
• Re: Odd keyboard related crashes. Eric W. Biederman (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:18:02 EST)
  • Re: Odd keyboard related crashes. Ian Stirling (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:21:11 EST)
  • Re: Odd keyboard related crashes. Nicholas Berry (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 05:51:47 EST)
    • Re: Odd keyboard related crashes. James Simmons (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:28:37 EST)
      • Re: Odd keyboard related crashes. Daniel Egger (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:02:57 EST)
• [patch 2.4.11-pre5] atomic_dec_and_lock() for alpha Ivan Kokshaysky (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:42:57 EST)
  • Re: [patch 2.4.11-pre5] atomic_dec_and_lock() for alpha Richard Henderson (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:24:12 EST)
    • Re: [patch 2.4.11-pre5] atomic_dec_and_lock() for alpha Ivan Kokshaysky (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 05:30:13 EST)
      • Re: [patch 2.4.11-pre5] atomic_dec_and_lock() for alpha Richard Henderson (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 13:28:10 EST)
      • Re: [patch 2.4.11-pre5] atomic_dec_and_lock() for alpha Ivan Kokshaysky (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 07:35:59 EST)
• [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Dave McCracken (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:46:15 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Christoph Hellwig (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:52:42 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:07:56 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:05:48 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Linus Torvalds (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:44:54 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:52:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Linus Torvalds (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:17:09 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id Miquel van Smoorenburg (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:15:39 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Provide system call to get task id David Woodhouse (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:53:41 EST)
• Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Bill Davidsen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:54:00 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Kain X (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:35:22 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Bill Davidsen (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:55:41 EST)
    • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:30:01 EST)
      • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels bill davidsen (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 13:15:28 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Tim Moore (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:00:58 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Tim Moore (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:13:37 EST)
    • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Bill Davidsen (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 17:19:16 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Doug McNaught (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 15:54:41 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Horst von Brand (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 21:18:14 EST)
  • Re: Breaking system configuration in stable kernels Bill Davidsen (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 16:43:20 EST)
• Possible change to ./scripts/split-include.c Bob Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:05:09 EST)
  • Re: Possible change to ./scripts/split-include.c Linus Torvalds (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:48:26 EST)
• [OT] testing internet performance, esp latency/drops? Larry McVoy (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:02:03 EST)
  • Re: [OT] testing internet performance, esp latency/drops? Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:30:07 EST)
  • Re: [OT] testing internet performance, esp latency/drops? Pedro M. Rodrigues (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:37:21 EST)
  • Re: [OT] testing internet performance, esp latency/drops? Rob Landley (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:21:24 EST)
  • Re: [OT] testing internet performance, esp latency/drops? Henning P. Schmiedehausen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:30:03 EST)
• Re: sis630/celeron perf sucks? Eric W. Biederman (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 10:58:02 EST)
  • Re: sis630/celeron perf sucks? Stefan Smietanowski (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:50:52 EST)
    • Re: sis630/celeron perf sucks? Benjamin LaHaise (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:54:20 EST)
• AGP Stability tests? DevilKin (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:17:32 EST)
• Re: [patch] 2.4.11-pre4 remove spurious kernel recompiles bill davidsen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:19:03 EST)
  • Re: [patch] 2.4.11-pre4 remove spurious kernel recompiles bill davidsen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:56:20 EST)
• Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar... lkv@isg.de (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:32:06 EST)
  • Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar... Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:44:24 EST)
    • Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar... lkv@isg.de (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:06:31 EST)
      • Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar... Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:24:45 EST)
  • Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar... Jan Hudec (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:37:02 EST)
    • Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar... Jamie Lokier (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 11:05:09 EST)
• [PATCH] Re: Linux-2.4.11-pre5 Robert Schiele (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:32:40 EST)
• Re: sun + gigabit nic Thomas Duffy (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:44:13 EST)
  • Re: sun + gigabit nic kernel@ddx.a2000.nu (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:07:29 EST)
    • Re: sun + gigabit nic David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:11:19 EST)
      • Re: sun + gigabit nic kernel@ddx.a2000.nu (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:27:18 EST)
    • Re: sun + gigabit nic Joel Jaeggli (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:25:15 EST)
      • Re: sun + gigabit nic kernel@ddx.a2000.nu (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:32:52 EST)
      • Re: sun + gigabit nic Benjamin LaHaise (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:39:56 EST)
  • Re: sun + gigabit nic David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:12:56 EST)
• ReiserFS Bug Aleksander Adamowski (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:44:24 EST)
• Re: Question concering SBLIVE! driver. war (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:44:20 EST)
  • Re: Question concering SBLIVE! driver. war (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 15:07:02 EST)
• Linux 2.4.10-ac9 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:07:59 EST)
• Re: IDE DMA errors [was: Some ext2 errors] Riley Williams (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 06:19:01 EST)
  • Re: IDE DMA errors [was: Some ext2 errors] David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F3mez (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:24:42 EST)
• Re: OOM-Killer in 2.4.11pre4 Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 11:12:39 EST)
• linux-2.4.10-acX Louis Garcia (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:40:37 EST)
  • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:07:12 EST)
    • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Louis Garcia (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:21:54 EST)
      • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:29:12 EST)
    • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Robert Love (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:23:22 EST)
      • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:32:01 EST)
      • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Linus Torvalds (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:01:58 EST)
    • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Mike Fedyk (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:28:22 EST)
      • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:36:57 EST)
    • Re: linux-2.4.10-acX Greg KH (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:15:26 EST)
• More 2.4.9 vs. 2.4.10 numbers Peter Rival (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:46:54 EST)
• Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Martin J. Bligh (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:57:47 EST)
  • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:10:13 EST)
    • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Martin J. Bligh (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:20:59 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:31:04 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Jesse Barnes (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:35:22 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Martin J. Bligh (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:55:45 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Marcelo Tosatti (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:48:49 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Martin J. Bligh (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:20:59 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Jesse Barnes (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:12:06 EST)
      • Re: Whining about NUMA. :) [Was whining about 2.5...] Peter Rival (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:37:27 EST)
• Re: 3ware discontinuing the Escalade Series Mike Panetta (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 12:38:05 EST)
  • Re: 3ware discontinuing the Escalade Series Joel Jaeggli (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:38:15 EST)
• Where to find benchmarks??? John Gluck (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:06:46 EST)
  • Re: Where to find benchmarks??? Randy.Dunlap (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:28:07 EST)
    • Re: Where to find benchmarks??? John Gluck (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:57:17 EST)
• Problem with ACPI on Abit KT7,HPT370 Dominik Geisel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 13:10:40 EST)
  • RE: Problem with ACPI on Abit KT7,HPT370 Dominik Thinay (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:35:42 EST)
    • Re: Problem with ACPI on Abit KT7,HPT370 Dominik Geisel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:20:53 EST)
  • Re: Problem with ACPI on Abit KT7,HPT370 Xavier Bestel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:13:51 EST)
• Re: Linux-2.4.11-pre5 Simon Kirby (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:02:23 EST)
  • Re: Linux-2.4.11-pre5 Simon Kirby (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:47:38 EST)
    • Re: Linux-2.4.11-pre5 Johannes Erdfelt (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:21:25 EST)
      • Re: Linux-2.4.11-pre5 Simon Kirby (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:30:15 EST)
• write/read cache raid5 raid@ddx.a2000.nu (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:01:36 EST)
  • Re: write/read cache raid5 raid@ddx.a2000.nu (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:10:59 EST)
    • Re: write/read cache raid5 Alistair Riddell (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:17:21 EST)
      • Re: write/read cache raid5 David Chow (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 22:15:42 EST)
      • Re: write/read cache raid5 Alistair Riddell (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 04:06:24 EST)
    • Re: write/read cache raid5 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:29:54 EST)
      • Re: write/read cache raid5 Nico Dummer (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 08:14:39 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Peter Rival (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:27:49 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David Woodhouse (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:36:26 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:49:41 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:46:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David Woodhouse (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:06:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:08:54 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David Woodhouse (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:42:04 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:46:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:16:27 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Dave Jones (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:24:18 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:33:43 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:30:54 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop George Greer (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:01:47 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 05:33:56 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Keith Owens (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:30:02 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Alan Cox (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:15:49 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:13:22 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Linus Torvalds (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:46:04 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop David Woodhouse (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:03:22 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Etienne Lorrain (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:51:40 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Alan Cox (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:30:39 EST)
• Re: linmodems (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices) Tim Jansen (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:34:02 EST)
  • Re: linmodems (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] FUSD v1.00: Framework for User-Space Devices) Pavel Machek (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 07:19:11 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac9 CDRW Packet Fix Toby Milne (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:35:13 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac9 CDRW Packet Fix Jens Axboe (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:41:57 EST)
• [PATCH] dead keys in unicode console mode Radovan Garabik (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 14:53:13 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] dead keys in unicode console mode Guest section DW (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:16:18 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] dead keys in unicode console mode H. Peter Anvin (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:25:15 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] dead keys in unicode console mode Radovan Garabik (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:28:58 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] dead keys in unicode console mode Pavel Machek (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 12:19:34 EST)
• [PATCH] eliminating virt_to_bus, bus_to_virt from cpqfc driver Stephen Cameron (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:00:32 EST)
• PATCH -- Update e-mail address for Giuliano Procida Miles Lane (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:47:35 EST)
• Kernel crash with ISDN MPPP Cédric Rochat (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 15:57:11 EST)
• Re: how to get virtual address from dma address Gérard Roudier (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:06:02 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac9: EXPORT_SYMBOLS compile fix Robert Love (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:29:13 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac9: EXPORT_SYMBOLS compile fix Keith Owens (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:19:50 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac9: EXPORT_SYMBOLS compile fix Robert Love (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:23:48 EST)
• [PATCH] Hotplug PCI driver for 2.4.11-pre5 Greg KH (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:23:21 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] core file naming option Phil Edwards (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:32:14 EST)
• Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:57:57 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Adrian Bunk (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:39:09 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:32:30 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Adrian Bunk (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:04:36 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:40:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:15:43 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Adrian Bunk (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 03:47:40 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Rasmus Andersen (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:09:05 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Adrian Bunk (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:30:01 EST)
      • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 05:29:17 EST)
  • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 willy tarreau (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:20:11 EST)
    • Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac10 Adrian Bunk (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:30:25 EST)
• A note on APIC bus latency Jonathan Lundell (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:51:19 EST)
  • Re: A note on APIC bus latency Alan Cox (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:08:13 EST)
• Kernel 2.4.11-5 Compile Error AIC7XXX_OLD.C war (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:54:12 EST)
  • Re: Kernel 2.4.11-5 Compile Error AIC7XXX_OLD.C James Simmons (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:03:09 EST)
• Can't exec /usr/sbin/sendmail (After Kernel Install) ?? Peter Moscatt (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:03:28 EST)
  • Re: Can't exec /usr/sbin/sendmail (After Kernel Install) ?? Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:50:19 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac8: drivers/sbus MODULE_LICENSE additions David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:21:31 EST)
• [ANNOUNCE] kernel v2.0.40-pre2 David Weinehall (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 17:38:48 EST)
• Scheduler latency tester ... Davide Libenzi (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:10:20 EST)
• PF_PACKET: packets out of order Joerg Schumacher (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:32:16 EST)
  • Re: PF_PACKET: packets out of order David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:43:37 EST)
    • Re: PF_PACKET: packets out of order Joerg Schumacher (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 20:43:14 EST)
• [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Rik van Riel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:38:27 EST)
  • Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Bill Huey (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 20:28:20 EST)
  • Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Robert Love (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:29:13 EST)
    • Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Bill Huey (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 21:04:49 EST)
  • Re: [CFT][PATCH *] faster cache reclaim Krishnakumar B (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:49:39 EST)
• Re: RAID sync Neil Brown (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:26:32 EST)
  • Re[2]: RAID sync Oleg A. Yurlov (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:37:19 EST)
• Re: kernel: svc: bad direction / kernel: svc: short len 4, dropping request Neil Brown (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 18:30:11 EST)
• [PATCH] 2.4.10-ac10: more MODULE_LICENSE tags, mostly ISDN Frank Davis (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:03:32 EST)
• linux-2.0.40-pre2 patch error Seiichi Nakashima (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:13:38 EST)
  • Re: linux-2.0.40-pre2 patch error David Weinehall (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:23:41 EST)
• Error in Documentation Sir Ace (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:15:12 EST)
• kupdated oopsed in generic_make_request andersg@0x63.nu (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:15:41 EST)
• Re: kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10} Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:59:15 EST)
  • Re: kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10} Dieter Nützel (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 20:59:16 EST)
  • Re: kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10} Andrea Arcangeli (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:07:53 EST)
• Re: AIC7xxx panic David M. Grimes (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 19:51:12 EST)
  • Re: AIC7xxx panic Justin T. Gibbs (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:21:58 EST)
  • Re: AIC7xxx panic Alan Cox (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:47:15 EST)
• RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul E. McKenney (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 20:55:24 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:18:47 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:27:44 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion David S. Miller (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:56:10 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 01:43:35 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 01:52:08 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 04:03:37 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:11:01 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:39:37 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:13:55 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:46:26 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:21:45 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:48:32 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:28:40 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:45:15 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:00:23 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul Mackerras (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:33:58 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 12:02:08 EST)
    • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 21:05:02 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:05:10 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:17:33 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Davide Libenzi (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:29:36 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:46:25 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:01:08 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Victor Yodaiken (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:23:00 EST)
      • kdb requires kallsyms Kirill Ratkin (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:14:13 EST)
      • Re: kdb requires kallsyms BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:38:40 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul Mackerras (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:16:21 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:30:17 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul Mackerras (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:36:18 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Victor Yodaiken (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:54:36 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Keith Owens (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 16:56:43 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Victor Yodaiken (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:24:19 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion David S. Miller (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 18:46:28 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Davide Libenzi (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 19:24:02 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Keith Owens (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 06:54:39 EST)
      • AIC7XXX war (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 08:42:00 EST)
      • Re: AIC7XXX Luigi Genoni (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 16:40:56 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 23:43:01 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:54:00 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:06:03 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:21:05 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:06:24 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:58:30 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:36:13 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 01:50:19 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 05:06:13 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 05:18:23 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 06:43:55 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 22:27:33 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 11:56:58 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 13:53:13 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 02:25:27 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Ivan Kokshaysky (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 08:24:31 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 08:41:11 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 11:00:21 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:24:11 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Andrea Arcangeli (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 11:58:48 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 12:25:22 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 00:06:06 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 11:28:07 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Al Dunsmuir (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 14:50:00 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul Mackerras (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 20:07:53 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Davide Libenzi (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 20:54:36 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 21:04:46 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Davide Libenzi (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 21:31:42 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Davide Libenzi (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 21:46:14 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 22:30:20 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul Mackerras (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 21:49:01 EST)
      • Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists Paul E. McKenney (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 09:11:08 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 21:00:41 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists Alan Cox (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 08:54:25 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 02:38:21 EST)
      • Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M Paul E. McKenney (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 11:28:15 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion ^M Rusty Russell (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 16:23:11 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with Albert D. Cahalan (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 00:43:56 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with Paul Mackerras (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 01:26:34 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with Paul McKenney (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 01:35:38 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with Alex Bligh - linux-kernel (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 03:28:12 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with Jonathan Lundell (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 03:51:17 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 16:44:18 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 05:34:29 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 09:42:49 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 12:23:23 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Linus Torvalds (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 12:28:13 EST)
      • Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists Paul E. McKenney (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 21:04:11 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Dipankar Sarma (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 02:25:01 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 16:19:54 EST)
      • Re: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul E. McKenney (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 20:37:34 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Andi Kleen (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 13:42:34 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Alexander Viro (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 14:15:39 EST)
      • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 15:44:23 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:24:17 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Manfred Spraul (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:51:00 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:46:46 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:01:40 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:19:49 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:43:30 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul McKenney (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 16:47:05 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:22:51 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Richard Henderson (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:27:17 EST)
  • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul E. McKenney (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 20:56:26 EST)
    • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Rusty Russell (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 23:14:19 EST)
      • Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul E. McKenney (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 09:48:30 EST)
• Wireless Extension update Jean Tourrilhes (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:12:47 EST)
  • Re: Wireless Extension update Randy.Dunlap (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:22:18 EST)
    • Re: Wireless Extension update Jean Tourrilhes (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:35:10 EST)
    • Re: Wireless Extension update Riley Williams (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 16:58:53 EST)
      • Re: Wireless Extension update H. Peter Anvin (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 19:07:53 EST)
      • Re: Wireless Extension update Roeland Th. Jansen (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 14:26:47 EST)
      • Re: Wireless Extension update H. Peter Anvin (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 14:31:16 EST)
      • Re: Wireless Extension update Tobias Ringstrom (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 16:02:20 EST)
  • Re: Wireless Extension update H. Peter Anvin (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 19:08:51 EST)
  • Re: Wireless Extension update Jean Tourrilhes (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 11:37:05 EST)
• Wireless Extension update - part II Jean Tourrilhes (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:16:04 EST)
• [UPDATE] PCI64 patches David S. Miller (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:23:32 EST)
• BUG: Memory usage, 2.4.10 meaning of "free" and cached. Elmer Joandi (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:55:53 EST)
• parport problems in 2.4.[9,10] Binx Bolling (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 22:07:54 EST)
  • Re: parport problems in 2.4.[9,10] Tim Waugh (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:01:27 EST)
• [PATCH] PnPBIOS bugfix (last of the first round of cleanups) Thomas Hood (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 22:27:06 EST)
• jbd_preclean_buffer_check. Todd Roy (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:05:51 EST)
  • Re: jbd_preclean_buffer_check. Keith Owens (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:24:18 EST)
    • Re: jbd_preclean_buffer_check. Todd M. Roy (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:42:15 EST)
• Truncated dmesg at boot up Jordan Breeding (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:06:33 EST)
• linux test project results on 2.4.11-pre6 and 2.4.10-ac10 rwhron@earthlink.net (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:10:42 EST)
• weird problem with hdb=scsi Jordan Breeding (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 23:12:09 EST)
• [PATCH] Re: ENOATTR and other error enums Nathan Scott (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:01:14 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Re: ENOATTR and other error enums Alan Cox (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:37:55 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Re: ENOATTR and other error enums Nathan Scott (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:31:59 EST)
• Simple question on files & sockets in kernel space. Ben Greear (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:16:06 EST)
• Too good to refuse mail@maketopmoney.com (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 01:49:50 EST)
  • Too good to refuse mail@maketopmoney.com (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 19:47:11 EST)
• [PATCH] devfs v194 available Richard Gooch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 01:04:04 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] devfs v194 available Alexander Viro (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:50:35 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] devfs v194 available Richard Gooch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:03:02 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] devfs v194 available Alexander Viro (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:28:24 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] devfs v194 available Richard Gooch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:48:31 EST)
• [PATCH] ATA RAID breaks modular IDE compile Richard Gooch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 00:59:39 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] ATA RAID breaks modular IDE compile Keith Owens (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 01:15:04 EST)
• share buffer between user and kernel? Peter T. Breuer (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 02:03:35 EST)
  • Re: share buffer between user and kernel? Tommy Reynolds (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 11:12:19 EST)
• [2.4.10] /proc freeze during core dump? Thomas Roessler (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 03:33:59 EST)
• (no subject) VDA (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 05:25:32 EST)
  • (no subject) Astrit Zhushi (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:41:57 EST)
  • (no subject) Êæ¹úÇ¿ (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 00:10:24 EST)
    • (no subject) Keith Owens (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 00:18:02 EST)
  • (no subject) Michael Kerrisk (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 11:48:19 EST)
  • (no subject) Dinesh Gandhewar (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 01:25:05 EST)
    • Re: your mail Tim Hockin (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 01:31:44 EST)
    • Re: David Ford (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 01:56:27 EST)
      • Re: Timur Tabi (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 11:02:58 EST)
• Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Marco Berizzi (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 04:32:24 EST)
  • [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) VDA (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:45:17 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Marco Berizzi (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:04:39 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Gergely Tamas (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:55:22 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Alejandro Conty (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:59:07 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Brian Gerst (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:19:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Luigi Genoni (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:22:35 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Bryan Mayland (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:00:42 EST)
      • No locking is needed ... why? Kirill Ratkin (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:13:57 EST)
      • Re: No locking is needed ... why? BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:30:05 EST)
      • Re: No locking is needed ... why? Rik van Riel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:37:56 EST)
      • Re: No locking is needed ... why? BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:45:59 EST)
      • Re: No locking is needed ... why? Rik van Riel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:50:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Bill Davidsen (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:28:18 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Fabio Coatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:27:46 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Alejandro Conty (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:52:46 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Gergely Tamas (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:52:57 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:12:49 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:11:07 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Luigi Genoni (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:19:40 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Dan Maas (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 23:06:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] again: Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) VDA (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 03:09:31 EST)
  • Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Marco Berizzi (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:38:07 EST)
  • Re: Athlon kernel crash (i686 works) Roberto Jung Drebes (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:37:23 EST)
• keyboard + PS/2 mouse locks after opening psaux Krzysztof Halasa (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 05:21:48 EST)
  • Re: keyboard + PS/2 mouse locks after opening psaux Marius Gedminas (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 10:24:17 EST)
  • Re: keyboard + PS/2 mouse locks after opening psaux Marius Gedminas (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 08:33:22 EST)
• 2.4.11-pre6 Klaus Dittrich (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:06:56 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.11-pre6 Liakakis Kostas (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:27:53 EST)
• 2.4.11-pre6: redefined & Unresolved symbols Rolf Eike Beer (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 06:55:32 EST)
• Re: Reg-network driver. SATHISH.J (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:23:11 EST)
  • Re: Reg-network driver. Randy.Dunlap (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:49:49 EST)
  • Re: Reg-network driver. Bernd Eckenfels (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:43:48 EST)
  • Re: Reg-network driver. Dan Maas (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:49:50 EST)
• ifconfig exit_signal 17 in reparent_to_init Bernfried Molte (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:46:26 EST)
• [PATCH 2.4.11-pre6 and 2.4.10-ac10] MotionEye camera documentation update Stelian Pop (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:11:34 EST)
• [PATCH 2.4.10-ac10] sonypi driver update Stelian Pop (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:15:15 EST)
• kernel size VDA (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:16:34 EST)
  • Re: kernel size [solid] (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:26:14 EST)
  • Re: kernel size Nikita Danilov (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:28:53 EST)
    • Re: kernel size, kcore fun Helge Hafting (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:10:30 EST)
  • Re: kernel size Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:16:48 EST)
    • Re: kernel size Ingo Oeser (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:43:48 EST)
      • Re: kernel size Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:52:50 EST)
      • Re: kernel size Keith Owens (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:27:49 EST)
  • Re: kernel size Horst von Brand (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:43:14 EST)
    • Re: kernel size Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:53:48 EST)
      • Re: kernel size Keith Owens (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:29:31 EST)
      • Re: kernel size Richard B. Johnson (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 08:00:32 EST)
      • Re: kernel size vda (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 09:47:10 EST)
      • Re: kernel size vda (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 07:41:58 EST)
      • Re: kernel size Kenneth Johansson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:30:03 EST)
    • Re: kernel size Jakub Jelinek (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:55:32 EST)
• [PATCH 2.4.11-pre6] sonypi driver updates Stelian Pop (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:17:26 EST)
• [PATCH] Trivial patch for SIOCGIFCOUNT BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:23:47 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch for SIOCGIFCOUNT David S. Miller (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:37:46 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch for SIOCGIFCOUNT BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:36:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch for SIOCGIFCOUNT kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 13:31:44 EST)
• Re: proc file system Jan Hudec (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:41:34 EST)
  • Re: proc file system Steve Brueggeman (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:49:38 EST)
    • Re: proc file system Jan Hudec (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 12:04:42 EST)
      • Re: proc file system Riley Williams (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 15:06:00 EST)
      • Re: proc file system Jan Hudec (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 10:02:39 EST)
• [LTP] VFS: brelse: started after 2.4.10-ac7 rwhron@earthlink.net (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:47:07 EST)
  • Re: [LTP] VFS: brelse: started after 2.4.10-ac7 Nikita Danilov (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:50:19 EST)
  • Re: [LTP] VFS: brelse: started after 2.4.10-ac7 Chris Mason (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:55:37 EST)
  • Re: [LTP] VFS: brelse: started after 2.4.10-ac7 Alan Cox (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:14:34 EST)
• sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:01:27 EST)
  • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Alan Cox (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:18:06 EST)
    • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:35:34 EST)
  • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Dave Jones (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:15:04 EST)
    • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:21:14 EST)
      • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Dave Jones (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:34:13 EST)
      • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:50:08 EST)
      • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Dave Jones (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:52:53 EST)
      • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:56:53 EST)
      • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Dave Jones (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:53:19 EST)
  • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:48:56 EST)
    • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Dave Jones (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 09:05:32 EST)
  • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 21:56:26 EST)
    • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Dave Jones (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 01:46:41 EST)
      • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 07:37:23 EST)
  • Re: sysctl interface to bootflags? Thomas Hood (Mon Oct 08 2001 - 22:29:27 EST)
• pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:44:37 EST)
  • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 07:48:46 EST)
  • Re: pre6 VM issues BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:17:37 EST)
    • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:01:31 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:37:19 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:43:41 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:44:17 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:56:20 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:22:01 EST)
  • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:31:26 EST)
    • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:13:07 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:42:54 EST)
    • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:23:24 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:53:16 EST)
  • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:50:02 EST)
    • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:34:47 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:39:37 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:08:14 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:49:12 EST)
      • Re: pre6 VM issues Linus Torvalds (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:07:17 EST)
• qsbench Lorenzo Allegrucci (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:31:47 EST)
• Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0.1-rc3 available at www.sistina.com Kurt Garloff (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:31:55 EST)
  • Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0.1-rc3 available at www.sistina.com Heinz J . Mauelshagen (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 04:27:59 EST)
• Not getting arp replies? Chris Meadors (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:57:45 EST)
  • ISSUE: vm bug? in 2.4.10 paran213@student.liu.se (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:38:14 EST)
• [PATCH] Sticky/Key-Setable SysRq (resubmit) Crutcher Dunnavant (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 09:52:51 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Sticky/Key-Setable SysRq (resubmit) H. Peter Anvin (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:43:32 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Sticky/Key-Setable SysRq (resubmit) BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 03:52:17 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Sticky/Key-Setable SysRq (resubmit) Crutcher Dunnavant (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 17:51:04 EST)
• is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? BALBIR SINGH (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:02:35 EST)
  • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? Andrew Morton (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:13:50 EST)
    • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? Rob Landley (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:26:18 EST)
      • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 06:17:57 EST)
      • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? BALBIR SINGH (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 08:02:24 EST)
      • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? Rob Landley (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:13:45 EST)
  • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? Pete Zaitcev (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:46:19 EST)
  • Re: is reparent_to_init a good thing to do? Jesse Pollard (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 09:38:16 EST)
• VM-related freeze of UP2000SMP using 2.4.11-pre3aa1 G. Hugh Song (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:06:08 EST)
  • Re: VM-related freeze of UP2000SMP using 2.4.11-pre3aa1 Stephan von Krawczynski (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:22:40 EST)
• Re: [patch] Race between init_idle and reschedule_idle Hubertus Franke (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 08:12:22 EST)
  • Re: [patch] Race between init_idle and reschedule_idle Martin J. Bligh (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:56:30 EST)
• kapmidled and AMD K6-2 Jose_Jorge@teklynx.fr (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:15:20 EST)
  • Re: kapmidled and AMD K6-2 Dave Jones (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:45:50 EST)
    • Re: kapmidled and AMD K6-2 Ookhoi (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 04:06:26 EST)
    • Re: kapmidled and AMD K6-2 Pavel Machek (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 08:01:39 EST)
      • Re: kapmidled and AMD K6-2 Dave Jones (Sat Oct 13 2001 - 14:53:19 EST)
  • Re: kapmidled and AMD K6-2 Kurt Roeckx (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:40:39 EST)
• [PATCH] bootflag.c cleanup and fix (only) Thomas Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 10:15:32 EST)
• [Q] cannot fork w/ 1000s of procs (but still mem avail.) Till Immanuel Patzschke (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:08:55 EST)
  • Re: [Q] cannot fork w/ 1000s of procs (but still mem avail.) Rik van Riel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:10:00 EST)
  • Re: [Q] cannot fork w/ 1000s of procs (but still mem avail.) Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 15:54:22 EST)
• Re: Sonypi driver? Stelian Pop (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:04:42 EST)
• [PATCH] Update to the Compaq cpqarray driver... White, Charles (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:17:01 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Update to the Compaq cpqarray driver... Andreas Dilger (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:19:30 EST)
• Re: 2.4.x, smp, eepro100 java programmer (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:58:06 EST)
• iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Trever L. Adams (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:58:24 EST)
  • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Jeffrey W. Baker (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:07:05 EST)
    • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Trever L. Adams (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:30:14 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Jeffrey W. Baker (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:31:28 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Trever L. Adams (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:40:40 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Jeffrey W. Baker (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:48:27 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Trever L. Adams (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:00:43 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Luigi Genoni (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:46:31 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Trever L. Adams (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:49:43 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Luigi Genoni (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:02:45 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Jeffrey W. Baker (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:05:30 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Luigi Genoni (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 18:40:09 EST)
      • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Sebastian Benoit (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 03:45:42 EST)
    • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Rusty Russell (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:55:03 EST)
  • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Wilson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:40:59 EST)
    • Re: iptables in 2.4.10, 2.4.11pre6 problems Trever L. Adams (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:43:42 EST)
• [PATCH] devfs v195 available Richard Gooch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:11:50 EST)
• [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Matt Domsch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:15:20 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Richard Gooch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:25:35 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Martin Wilck (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 03:31:08 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Richard Gooch (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 09:56:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Andreas Dilger (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 11:27:03 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Andreas Dilger (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:03:16 EST)
  • RE: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Matt_Domsch@Dell.com (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:01:35 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Andreas Dilger (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 23:23:59 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Martin Wilck (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 05:12:49 EST)
    • RE: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Richard Gooch (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:18:50 EST)
  • RE: [PATCH] EFI GUID Partition Tables Matt_Domsch@Dell.com (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:08:46 EST)
• [PATCH] mwave config fix and module tags Paul B Schroeder (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:50:02 EST)
• Which switch should be enabled in kernel to support global IPv6 forwarding Yaroslav Popovitch (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:29:42 EST)
  • Re: Which switch should be enabled in kernel to support global IPv6forwarding Mika Liljeberg (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:54:23 EST)
• Emu10k1 driver update Rui Sousa (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:34:24 EST)
  • Re: Emu10k1 driver update Linus Torvalds (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:01:18 EST)
    • Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Emu10k1 driver update Rui Sousa (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:45:52 EST)
      • Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Emu10k1 driver update Jeff Garzik (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:52:53 EST)
      • Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Emu10k1 driver update Rui Sousa (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:11:31 EST)
      • Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Emu10k1 driver update Jeff Garzik (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:27:46 EST)
• 2.4.10 oom_killer mtassinari@tin.it (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 12:44:17 EST)
  • Re: 2.4.10 oom_killer Marcelo Tosatti (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 11:28:07 EST)
• 2.4.11pre6aa1 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:55:16 EST)
  • 2.4.11aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11pre6aa1] Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:11:04 EST)
    • 2.4.12aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11pre6aa1]] Andrea Arcangeli (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 05:32:31 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.12aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11pre6aa1]] Lorenzo Allegrucci (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:59:17 EST)
      • Re: 2.4.12aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11aa1 [was Re: 2.4.11pre6aa1]] Andrea Arcangeli (Fri Oct 12 2001 - 00:06:55 EST)
• VM crash with 2.4.10 & SMP Mika Liljeberg (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:59:56 EST)
  • Re: VM crash with 2.4.10 & SMP Rik van Riel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:05:50 EST)
    • Re: VM crash with 2.4.10 & SMP Mika Liljeberg (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:41:06 EST)
• memory balancing highmem/dma fixes against pre6 Andrea Arcangeli (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:07:09 EST)
• NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1 Martin Josefsson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:09:29 EST)
• devfs filesystem naming conventions? J.D. Hood (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:27:37 EST)
• [BUG] [2.4.10] echo "scsi add-single-device ..." corrupts /proc/partitions Rolf Fokkens (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 22:31:25 EST)
• Re[2]: RAID sync Oleg A. Yurlov (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:32:40 EST)
  • Re: Re[2]: RAID sync Jakob Østergaard (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 00:58:36 EST)
• sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 seth goldberg (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:57:16 EST)
  • Re: sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 Robert Vojta (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:05:02 EST)
    • Re: sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 Jeff Garzik (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:22:34 EST)
      • Re: sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 Robert Vojta (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:45:08 EST)
      • Re: sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 sethg@eng.sun.com (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:44:04 EST)
      • Re: sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 Jeff Garzik (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 20:35:56 EST)
  • Re: sis900 does not work in 2.4.10 Fabian Arias (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:13:47 EST)
• PROBLEM: old exploit works!!! Kitwor (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 14:48:33 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: old exploit works!!! Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:16:54 EST)
    • Re: PROBLEM: old exploit works!!! Fabbione (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:32:49 EST)
      • Re: PROBLEM: old exploit works!!! Richard B. Johnson (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:52:56 EST)
  • Re: PROBLEM: old exploit works!!! Manfred Spraul (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:59:40 EST)
• recent -ac performance thoughts Seth Arnold (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:40:50 EST)
• More on the 760MP German Gomez Garcia (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:00:07 EST)
  • Re: More on the 760MP Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:18:45 EST)
    • Re: More on the 760MP German Gomez Garcia (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:32:28 EST)
      • Re: More on the 760MP Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:37:08 EST)
      • Re: More on the 760MP German Gomez Garcia (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:20:32 EST)
  • Re: More on the 760MP Willem Riede (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 15:49:13 EST)
    • Re: More on the 760MP German Gomez Garcia (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 15:59:13 EST)
      • Re: More on the 760MP Stephen Frost (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 16:45:50 EST)
      • Re: More on the 760MP German Gomez Garcia (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 09:01:34 EST)
      • Re: More on the 760MP Jan-Benedict Glaw (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 09:32:40 EST)
• Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dieter Nützel (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:16:28 EST)
  • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Timur Tabi (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:52:50 EST)
    • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:06:00 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dr. Kelsey Hudson (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 20:46:51 EST)
    • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Robert Love (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:12:26 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Charles Cazabon (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:17:37 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:24:51 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? David Lang (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 16:09:19 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:32:58 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? German Gomez Garcia (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:27:31 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Robert Love (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:54:42 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Charles Cazabon (Wed Oct 10 2001 - 09:45:37 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? David Lang (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 15:58:50 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dan Hollis (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:30:14 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Robert Love (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 17:43:01 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? bill davidsen (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:14:01 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? nick@snowman.net (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:22:54 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Bill Davidsen (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 16:30:14 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dan Hollis (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 16:58:59 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Jeffrey W. Baker (Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:24:13 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Bill Davidsen (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 16:37:19 EST)
      • Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Joel Jaeggli (Mon Oct 15 2001 - 16:57:20 EST)